UncoveredExploreSign In
This week
VC Uncovered · Read · 12 min read · Aug 26, 2025

Courtney Leimkuhler

Springbank.VC

“It may sound provocative, but we often say one of the unconventional things we do is we take women seriously.”

Courtney Leimkuhler, Springbank.VC

The short version

Courtney Leimkuhler is a partner at Springbank, a venture firm focused on modernizing social infrastructure to meet the needs of women, drawing on her two decades as an operating executive at Goldman Sachs, the NYSE, and Marsh. She argues that despite women's growing economic power in the workforce, wealth, and caregiving, the venture capital ecosystem has largely failed to build products and infrastructure for them. Her main takeaway is that Springbank deliberately takes women seriously as founders, buyers, and customers, and bets on market-creating ventures in areas like childcare and healthcare that traditional VC frameworks overlook.

  • Courtney Leimkuhler is a partner at Springbank who spent 16 years in operating roles at Goldman Sachs, the NYSE, and Marsh before starting the fund.
  • Springbank's thesis centers on a demographic and economic transition where women are graduating college at higher rates, controlling 80% of household spending, and set to inherit over $100 trillion in the next decade.
  • She says the underrepresentation of women among VC founders and check-writers means the innovation engine misses important problems, particularly in childcare and healthcare.
  • Her investment philosophy prioritizes founders with deep expertise in a 'root cause problem' over founders she would back to build anything.
  • She weighs intuition mainly as a reason to stop a deal, relying on data and business model analysis to decide to invest.
  • The risk she is most excited to take is market-creation risk, betting on products or markets that have never existed before, such as new insurance products or medical devices.

Connect with Courtney

https://www.linkedin.com/in/courtney-leimkuhler

VC Uncovered's View

Courtney Leimkuhler is not your typical venture capitalist. As a partner at Springbank, she's using her two decades of experience as an operating executive to challenge the traditional investment playbook by focusing on a transformative yet overlooked economic frontier: modernizing our social infrastructure to better meet the needs of women.

Data powers her vision. Women are graduating from college at unprecedented rates, exercising ever-growing control over household spending, entering the workforce in massive numbers, acting as the principal caregivers (both paid and unpaid) for a rapidly aging population, and poised to inherit over $100 trillion in the next decade. Yet, the VC market – our engine room of innovation – is not innovating for them.

Her sharp intuition and unwavering commitment to Springbank’s thesis set Courtney apart. She sees beyond the typical venture capital metrics, recognizing that true innovation lies in solving fundamental societal gaps, particularly in areas like childcare and healthcare that impact millions.

At Springbank, Courtney is doing more than investing money. She's deliberately constructing an innovation ecosystem that takes women seriously, positioning them as primary architects of societal transformation.

While other firms might chase predictable investments, Courtney is betting on market-creating ventures that address profound social challenges. She understands that the most significant opportunities often hide in plain sight—in the spaces where traditional venture frameworks fear to tread.

Meet Courtney

Q: If you could be anywhere, eating, drinking, and reading whatever you like most, where would you be and what would those things be?
A: I’d be in Polebridge, Montana, with a cup of tea and a cinnamon rollie from the Merc. I’d be reading a book about meditation, hoping to finally get the hang of it.

Polebridge Mercantile

Key Quotes

"It may sound provocative, but we often say one of the unconventional things we do is we take women seriously."

"We can have Doritos in minutes but we can’t find daycare to save our lives."

"I weigh intuition heavily, but it’s usually the thing that will STOP me from doing a deal more than the thing that makes me do a deal."

"I’m not an 'I’ll back them building anything' type of investor. I want a founder who breathes and eats the data about the market they’re in."

"Success for me is to use VC to bring more of the innovation engine to bear on some of the most significant social challenges of our time."



Original Responses (Lightly Edited for Clarity and Flow)

Background and Personal Journey

Experiences Shaping My Investment Approach

I have always been motivated in my career by what I did and who I did it with and for. When I started thinking about venture, it was less borne of a specific desire to be a career investor or to have my own fund, and more of a conviction that venture was the right vehicle to get exposure to a transformational social and demographic transition. I’m really lucky that I usually managed to get myself in the right place at the right time in my career. I joined Goldman just as capital markets entered a period of monumental transition from a tech standpoint; I followed a Goldman exec to the NYSE and got to work on revolutionizing that storied institution from a non-profit to a for-profit and then to IPO via a historic M&A transaction. Later, I joined Marsh, the world’s largest insurance broker, right at the dawn of the insurtech trends. Through it all, I’ve followed my nose to things that looked a bit squirrely or non-obvious but seemed like they’d be pretty interesting, and thankfully, I was usually right.

Starting Springbank was similar. It felt like we were on the edge of an unprecedented social and demographic transition that had women at the center. Yet, the most powerful engine of innovation was not building with them in mind. We can have Doritos in minutes but we can’t find daycare to save our lives. And yet, women make up a larger share of the workforce than ever — and growing; women are the dominant paid and unpaid caregivers for a population that is careening expensively into old age; women will inherit over $100 trillion in the next decade, and their investment priorities are decidedly different from men’s; women graduate college at a rate significantly higher than men; women control 80% of household spending; and on and on. And so I just had a hunch that with all this change, there would be some interesting opportunities to build into this massive transition.

Moment Inspiring Venture Capital Career

It was 2016/17—I was still Marsh's CFO. We went on a visiting tour of the major VC funds out in the Valley, and that opened my eyes to “little tech” and “little finance,” whereas until then, I had only been exposed to large-scale fintech and the biggest capital stage there was—the NYSE. About a year later, Silicon Valley's lack of female founders and check-writers exploded as a headline issue. At first, it surprised me a bit — there is an underrepresentation of women across the economy, so why did this hit such a nerve in the public discourse? It was because the VC ecosystem in the US is so strong and powerful that it essentially gets to decide what problems are worth solving. Without women at the table, we were missing some pretty important problems. That really stuck with me, and I came to believe that our innovation engine needed to start working on the problems that affected women as the end user—building the infrastructure that is missing for them—and that starting Springbank was a way that I could contribute to that.

Influences on My Worldview

I’ve been fortunate to be on incredible teams in my life and career. From youth swimming to my college lacrosse team, I always played team sports. I immediately went into a career where I worked with a handful of awesome bosses and mentors who built strong teams. They also focused on doing business the right way — guided by a strong sense of doing the right thing for the right reason, being long-term greedy, negotiating fairly, and emphasizing the criticality of trust and relationships. I am passionate about the power of teams, the value of debate and hard work, and the need to pick each other up after inevitable mistakes. All of this leads me to a very team-oriented approach to decision-making, which requires highly structured thinking and putting the key points to paper so that we can baseline everyone with the same info and get the most out of the team’s effort and collective brain.

Unconventional Belief

It may sound provocative, but we often say one of the unconventional things we do is take women seriously as founders, buyers, and customers of services. It’s pretty well-documented that many investors do not. But we know that women are moving into the workforce, into wealth, and positions of societal power at an astounding rate compared to historical precedent — even if it still feels not fast enough. Women are not “little men,” as we have learned in everything from drug testing to car safety testing, and there will be a huge economic opportunity that will come from viewing the world through their eyes and building infrastructure that enables society to serve them better.

Balancing Intuition with Data

The answer is always both, I’m sure, for all investors. I am fascinated by the subconscious as an extracurricular pursuit — I think the things we don’t know (consciously) that we see are powerful contributors to our behavior and influence our decisions. So, I weigh intuition heavily, but it’s usually the thing that will STOP me from doing a deal more than the thing that makes me do a deal. To DO a deal, I am, first and foremost, data-driven. I focus heavily on the business model and incentive systems that work for or against a buyer’s reason to adopt. To be honest, I worry less about the specific math or data around TAM — we get paid to take market-creation bets.

Best Advice Received

Right after I started my job at Goldman, I got moved (by random selection, not by choice) from the M&A department in the investment bank to a trading firm that Goldman had acquired. It took me out of an advisory role and into an operating business overnight. At first, I thought about quitting and going to a different firm, but one of my bank mentors told me to try it — that it would be valuable to learn how a business is actually run from the inside. I took her advice, and it changed everything for me. I spent the next 16 years in operating jobs across financial services companies. As an investor, it is so valuable to have been inside of companies, understanding the daily grind of running a business, having an appreciation of all the stuff that goes wrong daily, and the highs that come when things go right. Working inside companies for all those years before starting Springbank, I saw it all: hiring, firing, successful M&A, flawed due diligence, shareholder lawsuits, employees with health issues, tech implementations gone wrong, successful IPOs, tense board meetings, and people who some thought were “not ready” actually step up and smash it out of the park. All of this experience is invaluable to me in my job today, and I never would have started down that path if my mentor hadn’t pushed me to.


Philosophy and Insights

Investment Philosophy

I’m looking for deep founder expertise + a “root cause problem” being addressed. I want an expert founder who knows their space well and all the challenges worth solving. This gives them the staying power needed to build a successful business. I’m not a “I’ll back them building anything” type of investor. I want a founder who breathes and eats the data about their market. And what I mean by a “root cause problem” is that there’s limited money and attention span in the real world. In older industries or less innovative sectors in particular, figuring out what can be improved doesn’t earn you a medal — that’s the easy part. Figuring out what people are incentivized to change and capable of fixing creates a lasting solution.

Values When Working with Founders

Integrity above all. There are 100 decisions to be made every day, so I need to feel really good about a founder’s integrity, long-term greed, transparency, and willingness to do the hard thing. That’s true for all decisions I make about who to work with, and even more critical in many of the spaces that we invest in that can be delicate like healthcare or financial services.

The Perfect Founder Pitch

The perfect pitch is a walk with a cup of tea, where I leave the conversation with a strong personal connection, a clear understanding of the founder’s motivation, and blown away by their degree of knowledge of their numbers and powerful intuition about how their target market works. I also leave with a simple understanding of their solution, whose adoption feels inevitable to me.

Approach to Risk

Risk selection is the work of venture capital — and I would argue many other jobs as well. Being the decider in any role is about choosing which risks you’re willing to take and which you aren’t. We invest at the very early stages — typically pre-seed and seed — so there is risk everywhere. Our diligence process tries to at least fully explore what’s knowable about a founder’s past experience and the market and buyer they’re going after because that knowable risk is the dumbest type of risk to take since you don’t have to. The risk that I am the most excited to take, because it often has the biggest reward, is market creation risk. We aren’t sure if there’s a market for a new insurance product or a new medical device or a new tool for teachers because no one has ever built it before — it’s not a slightly better mousetrap, it’s something that doesn’t exist. Those are the biggest swings and can be the most fun. That said, in the name of balancing risk across the portfolio, not every investment can have that type of risk.

Measuring Success Beyond Returns

The expression goes, “Life is short,” but I live by the opposite mantra in my career: “Life is long.” Success for me is using VC to bring more of the innovation engine to bear on some of our most significant social challenges. If we enable more people to build life-changing solutions for women in particular, that will be as important to me as the returns we deliver to our investors. And if we can do that so that everyone we work with — from our teammates to our co-investors to our founders — would work with us again, that’s the trifecta!


Philosophy and Insights

Investment Philosophy

I’m looking for deep founder expertise + a “root cause problem” being addressed. I want an expert founder who knows their space well and all the challenges worth solving. This gives them the staying power needed to build a successful business. I’m not a “I’ll back them building anything” type of investor. I want a founder who breathes and eats the data about their market. And what I mean by a “root cause problem” is that there’s limited money and attention span in the real world. In older industries or less innovative sectors in particular, figuring out what can be improved doesn’t earn you a medal — that’s the easy part. Figuring out what people are incentivized to change and capable of fixing creates a lasting solution.

Values When Working with Founders

Integrity above all. There are 100 decisions to be made every day, so I need to feel really good about a founder’s integrity, long-term greed, transparency, and willingness to do the hard thing. That’s true for all decisions I make about who to work with, and even more critical in many of the spaces that we invest in that can be delicate like healthcare or financial services.

The Perfect Founder Pitch

The perfect pitch is a walk with a cup of tea, where I leave the conversation with a strong personal connection, a clear understanding of the founder’s motivation, and blown away by their degree of knowledge of their numbers and powerful intuition about how their target market works. I also leave with a simple understanding of their solution, whose adoption feels inevitable to me.

Approach to Risk

Risk selection is the work of venture capital — and I would argue many other jobs as well. Being the decider in any role is about choosing which risks you’re willing to take and which you aren’t. We invest at the very early stages — typically pre-seed and seed — so there is risk everywhere. Our diligence process tries to at least fully explore what’s knowable about a founder’s past experience and the market and buyer they’re going after because that knowable risk is the dumbest type of risk to take since you don’t have to. The risk that I am the most excited to take, because it often has the biggest reward, is market creation risk. We aren’t sure if there’s a market for a new insurance product or a new medical device or a new tool for teachers because no one has ever built it before — it’s not a slightly better mousetrap, it’s something that doesn’t exist. Those are the biggest swings and can be the most fun. That said, in the name of balancing risk across the portfolio, not every investment can have that type of risk.

Measuring Success Beyond Returns

The expression goes, “Life is short,” but I live by the opposite mantra in my career: “Life is long.” Success for me is using VC to bring more of the innovation engine to bear on some of our most significant social challenges. If we enable more people to build life-changing solutions for women in particular, that will be as important to me as the returns we deliver to our investors. And if we can do that so that everyone we work with — from our teammates to our co-investors to our founders — would work with us again, that’s the trifecta!


More from Uncovered Media


Questions this answers

Who is Courtney Leimkuhler and what does she invest in?

Courtney Leimkuhler is a partner at Springbank, a venture capital firm that invests in modernizing social infrastructure to meet the needs of women, including areas like childcare and healthcare, typically at the pre-seed and seed stages.

What is Springbank's investment thesis?

Springbank's thesis is that women are undergoing a major social and demographic transition—entering the workforce in record numbers, controlling household spending, acting as caregivers, and set to inherit over $100 trillion—yet venture capital has not built the infrastructure to serve them, creating an overlooked investment opportunity.

What does Courtney Leimkuhler look for in founders?

She looks for founders with deep expertise in their market who understand a 'root cause problem,' meaning they know not just what needs improving but what people are incentivized and capable of actually changing.

How does Courtney Leimkuhler use intuition versus data when investing?

She says intuition usually functions as a signal to stop her from doing a deal rather than a reason to do one; to actually make an investment she relies first on data, focusing on business models and incentive systems rather than precise TAM calculations, since Springbank is paid to take market-creation bets.

What career experience shaped Courtney Leimkuhler's approach to venture capital?

She spent 16 years in operating roles, including as an executive at Goldman Sachs, working on the NYSE's transition to a for-profit company and IPO, and as CFO at Marsh, which gave her firsthand experience of running businesses that she now applies as an investor.

Originally published on VC Uncovered · By Drew Glover

Get the Uncovered digest The stories worth your time, picked for you.
By subscribing, you agree to receive emails from Uncovered and to our Terms and Privacy Policy. Unsubscribe anytime.